Skip to content
Explore the latest in gaming, technology, and esports with …

The Iconic Puzzle Game Couldn't Win at This Gaming Ceremony — An Additional Classification Might Solve This

As any significant awards ceremony nears, one notices an outcry for the addition fresh award types to recognize underappreciated efforts and fill the passions of enthusiasts who have specialized interests.

A fellow writer has already made for a horror game category. It would be amazing. The same goes for board games, which is a dedicated supporter's campaign. But they will have to forgive me when I prioritize because like all blinkered fanatics, I have a cast-iron argument backing this proposal is the most urgent above others. This is the request: It's essential to create an award type for logic-based games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Classifying creative works defies precise measurement; it remains highly personal, and typically spark debates and end in fuzzy definitions. It's understandable that film award organizations don’t do it. However, it represents an unavoidable compromise in the world of gaming, showing incredible range they hardly constitute as a single art form.

For the full spectrum of achievement in video games to receive acknowledgment, and for games of all stripes to compete fairly, specific award classifications remain vital.

Existing Game Classification System

Leading game ceremonies presently include classifications covering Action, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these award types actually cover a lot of ground, making space possible for numerous titles.

Not so for logic-based experiences. There’s simply nowhere to put them. Examine these examples from recent excellent titles, each quite distinct: structural challenges from a specific release, intense tile-matching of another game, engaging interpersonal challenges in another game. Which classification works between these six categories? Unfortunately, nowhere.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist excellent brain-teasers published annually without proper recognition at major award shows, if they accidentally match for categories like Handheld titles, VR/AR Game, or the extremely competitive independent game categories.

  • One classic puzzle game wasn’t nominated for anything during that awards season
  • A different innovative game was excluded in 2019
  • Well-received sorting experience received no acknowledgment in 2021
  • Limited numbers of brain-teasers barely qualified for independent or mobile categories

Significance of Puzzle Games

Commonly they're modest productions, however the design of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games rank among most popular titles globally continuing this trend for over a decade.

The iconic tile-matching title rivals well-known building titles claiming status as most purchased experience; it’s also in the running as greatest title ever. Puzzle games are foundational within interactive entertainment, while interacting with diverse game types.

Proposal and Rationale

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter such difficulty. You could fill five nominees interesting, varied, worthy titles every year with ease — perhaps, with difficulty, given the need to exclude so many good games out.

Restating the point, these represent titles without proper classification during prominent ceremonies. Brain-teaser creators operate at the challenging frontier interactive creation, developing some of most fundamental forms within interactive entertainment. Just like movie stunt professionals, they warrant appreciation. Let’s not keep them waiting decades.

JF
About the author

Jacob Fry

A tech journalist and gaming enthusiast with a decade of experience covering industry trends and innovations across Europe.

MegaCore Arena

Type to search articles.